Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 829923 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:25:26 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.69; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050330162440.WNUY2063.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:24:40 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Sounds like someone is getting touchy... Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:24:53 -0600 Message-ID: <02f701c53545$012d9ff0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02F8_01C53512.B6932FF0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02F8_01C53512.B6932FF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable He goes on to state "everything you see here is copyrighted". I can understand that may apply to stuff HE contributes.. but what if its text or intellectual property submitted by another (such as his = subscribers?)... I doesn't seem reasonable that HE could copyright anything but his own twisted ideas. In just a quick google search, I found the following = page that has some interesting info.=20 http://www.fplc.edu/tfield/copynet.htm I just skimmed through it, because I kept losing consciousness, and = drooling on my shirt. I did notice the following section: Private lists. "Private" lists are possible. All who sign up might expressedly agree, = say, not to forward list messages. Also, list messages could be archived anonymously, if at all, or access could be limited by use of passwords. Private lists should have few "fair use" problems; permission to use = others' posts should be limited mostly by what they agreed to when joining, not = by copyright law. I think he'd be hard pressed to act on his threats, especially = considering the number of charts, graphs, and info that the list has posted from = books and other sources. I say BS. Cheers, Rusty (copyright reserved for the legal info induced drool on my shirt) =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_02F8_01C53512.B6932FF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

He goes on to state "everything you see here is = copyrighted". I=20 can
understand that may apply to stuff HE contributes.. but what if = its=20 text
or intellectual property submitted by another (such as his=20 subscribers?)...

I doesn't seem reasonable = that HE=20 could copyright anything but his own twisted ideas.  In = just a=20 quick google search, I found the following page that has some = interesting=20 info. 

http://www.fplc.edu/tfiel= d/copynet.htm

I just skimmed through it, because = I kept=20 losing consciousness, and drooling on my shirt.  I did notice the = following=20 section:

Private lists.
"Private" = lists are=20 possible. All who sign up might expressedly agree, say, not to forward = list=20 messages. Also, list messages could be archived anonymously, if at all, = or=20 access could be limited by use of passwords.

Private lists should = have=20 few "fair use" problems; permission to use others' posts should be = limited=20 mostly by what they agreed to when joining, not by copyright=20 law.

I think he'd be hard pressed to = act on his=20 threats, especially considering the number of charts, graphs, and info = that the=20 list has posted from books and other sources.  I say BS.

Cheers,

Rusty (copyright reserved for the = legal info=20 induced drool on my shirt)

 
 



 ------=_NextPart_000_02F8_01C53512.B6932FF0--