Return-Path: Received: from server3.alwayswebhosting.com ([66.98.204.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP-TLS id 829207 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:23:56 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.98.204.64; envelope-from=bob@bob-white.com Received: from bgp01386375bgs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net ([68.35.160.229]:34128 helo=quail) by server3.alwayswebhosting.com with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DGQxe-0003gw-Lq for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:21:31 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:23:08 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [FlyRotary]RX8 P-Port Message-Id: <20050329172308.08636924.bob@bob-white.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server3.alwayswebhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bob-white.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Hi Ken, There's a 'w' missing in www. add that in and you will get it. Here it is fixed: http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=326924 Bob W. On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:11:59 +0000 kenpowell@comcast.net wrote: > George, I don't get a 'hit' with this address. > > Ken Powell > Bryant, Arkansas > 501-847-4721 > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > Ken, > Have a look at the discussion in > http://ww.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=326924 > I found this when searching for balancing. > I believe that the lack of extra Hp by one person could be some binding ( or drag) of the slightly bigger ( width ) rotor. > The second chap claims an extra 10 to 15% > George (down under) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: kenpowell@comcast.net > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 12:54 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: [FlyRotary]RX8 P-Port > > > Hi George, > I don't think we need to worry about apex seals in a non-turbo motor. Tracy's or Hurley's 2mm seals will never break in a NA motor since there is no problem with detonation. I just took some measurements of a '88 13b rotor: width measurements around the outside of the rotor showed 3.136 - 3.139 inches. Inside measurements from the gear face to the opposite side of the rotor (measured inside the bearing shell) was 3.144 to 3.145 inches. I do not have micrometers large enough to measure from an apex seal groove to the opposite curved face of the rotor. I don't have CAD capability so I can't send a drawing; can someone draw this up for us??? We need to compare these measurements to a RX8 rotor to see if the RX8 rotor will fit in the 'hole' of the earlier 13b's. > > Ken Powell > Bryant, Arkansas > 501-847-4721 > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > Ken, > That's very true, and what I plan on doing for the single, do you think it's worth going to 3mm for a non - turbo single rotor? > > The RX8 rotors are dirt cheap ( compared to new RX8 rotors) What dimensions do you want measured - I will do it for you! > George ( down under) > > I don't see the need for a 'bridged' intake port on the RX8 engine. The RX8 also uses a 2mm apex seal; I think we can grind the RX8 rotor apex seal groove to the same depth as the older rotors then use Tracy's or Hurley's 2mm spex seals in a peripheral ported Renesis. You should be also be able to use the lighter 8.7 lb RX8 rotors in the older engines if you get the rotating assembly balanced. Wish I had a RX8 rotor so I could measure the critical dimensions (but not bad enough to buy one!(grin)). > > Ken Powell > Bryant, Arkansas > 501-847-4721 -- http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)