Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #19559
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: AN fittings..
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:59:12 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
This same issue  was recently discussed in Van's newsletter.  Their position was that aluminum fittings were and are specified and used by Lycoming and OEM aircraft manufacturers.  They are not mandated by FAA or Part 23 regs.  They felt aluminum was just fine. 
OTOH, the only fittings I found for the main engine oil connections were Racing Beat's  and they are steel.
 
Tracy 
Lehanover@aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:14:16 AM Central Standard Time,
>Dastaten@earthlink.net writes:
>
><< And what is/was the rationale for not using AL fittings ?

> Dave >>
>
>Fatigue.
>
>Aluminum has a short fatigue life.
>(SNIP)
>
>Lynn E. Hanover

>
OK... now.. what about for fittings/aluminum lines that appear NOT to be
subjected to flex loads but still on the engine. For instance, running
from a rigidly mounted PSRU to the engine block..

http://www.rotaryresources.com/modules.php?set_albumName=album04&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

This should be a pic of a rotary with Tracy's PSRU on it, from Bruce's
webpage. Can I run AL tubing to AL fittings from an AL block to the AL
PSRU or again, should it be steel for safety (or convention's ) sake.
I'm really not HUNG UP on AL.. i just dont want to have to buy ANY part
more than once...and I'm getting ready to go buy parts.
 
Dave


>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster