Return-Path: Received: from imo-d20.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.136] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 828641 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:27:04 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.136; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-d20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r5.33.) id q.1d5.3927dcd4 (3940) for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:26:09 -0500 (EST) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <1d5.3927dcd4.2f7adba0@aol.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:26:08 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] AN fittings.. To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:14:16 AM Central Standard Time, Dastaten@earthlink.net writes: << Considering I am going to be sending the oil into a fitting that is connected to an aluminum bypass block on the pedestal, in OUR (rotary) situations is this a critical issue? And what is/was the rationale for not using AL fittings on the Lyc's? Dissimilar metals? Heat expansion stresses? Fatigue? Dave >> Fatigue. Aluminum has a short fatigue life. The engine is moving around on the mount all of the time. All hose runs to the engine should have a curve and some slack in them to account for this movement. The hose is clamped away from the engine with Adel or as part of another hose end as in a bulkhead fitter or similar. Refer to your hose catalogue for acceptable methods of installation. Lynn E. Hanover