Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 795374 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:35:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j2G2YwLw011251 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:34:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000d01c529d0$c1dcda20$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Good flight Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:35:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Tracy and me both! I think part of it was we didn't know for certain whether things would work as expected as they were not modeled after any flying rotaries - whole cloth so to speak. Using something that you know has been shown to work can lessen the angst level for sure. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:03 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Good flight > Ed Anderson wrote: > > >Great to hear, Steve. > > > >It seems it always takes some time to work out all the bugs that inevitably > >show up. Sounds like things are going right. > > > >Ed A > > > > > What I find interesting is how much less time it takes now, compared to > the earliest iterations. Steve's at 13hrs and is already starting to > relax. I believe I remember Tracy saying that he had quite a bit more > than that before he was comfortable. > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >