Return-Path: Received: from mv-relay-2.splasers.com ([65.119.109.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 794612 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:18:40 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.119.109.149; envelope-from=mike.wynn@spectra-physics.com Received: from usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com (firewall [172.22.1.10]) by mv-relay-2.splasers.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2FHJGt08739 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:19:22 -0800 Received: by usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:17:24 -0800 Message-ID: <5FA49D34561C5945BA9258B31BF648800355DAB4@usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com> From: "Wynn, Mike" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Peripheral port 26b Le Mans paper Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:17:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I am sure many will have seen this already: There is a paper on the R26b Le Mans engine at www.mymazdarotary.com under the `Mazda rotary general' tab. This peripheral port motor used a variable intake length and crude scaling from the drawings in the above paper suggests an intake runner diameter of just over 2 inches and a length of 22 inches at 6000rpm and something around 2 inches shorter at 7k. Peak torque for this 4 rotor (448ft lb) occurred at 6,500rpm when runner length appears to be about 21inches. A couple of questions: Jerry: why is your inlet port round - in two strokes they are more often oval, presumably to maximise flow for a given `valve opening'. I guess this is convenience for manufacturing??? Anybody: does the PP geometry make it much easier to make Al end plates and is this the easy route to much lighter engines? Lastly does anyone know where I can get some more information on PPs? cheers mike