Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 726832 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:58:54 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j1D2w5Ci001462 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:58:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000c01c51177$dca6b360$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Heretic! Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:58:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Wheers the stiks and farwood, Vern? I thunk we'se has us herein a Heritic. I belong to a couple of web forums, John. No question they have some nice features, but old dogs, new trick. I find I spend more time on this form - not certain its because it takes longer to read through all the stuff because we lack some of the features, you mentioned - or I just like the manner of exchange and folks better here. But, in any case, I remember when this list was started by Marv as a "alternative" list for the rotary fliers and I guess in my opinion it seems to work fine for the most part. I think the "more advanced web types" might find it somewhat crude and constrained, but for most of us it does the job. I really would not like to see the "rotary community" divided again - but, that's just my view on the topic. Okkk, Vernn - brung out the torch! I's got thu wood stack'n around the varmit. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slade" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 9:30 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Bandwidth/Netiquitte Issue.. "reply to all" > All, > > I am speaking only for myself, but I archive every single post and see > > very little reason to have duplicates of ANY post > You're not alone. I'm sure most of us keep a local copy of every single > post. > Like me, you probably rarely look at it because it isn't easy to find stuff. > What a waste! > > >Every time Paul Conner posts, we get some sort of attachment that says > there's no virus. > As Rusty says, this is reason 473 why mail lists are the Lycosaurus of > electronic communication. > > >web forums are so vastly superior to mail lists in this day and age. > Sorry. I can't pass up an opportunity like this. Here we are, struggling > with unwanted attachments and extra copies, fighting html, top or bottom > posting, archiving our own copies, and emailing our email addresses to > hundreds of virus vulnerable computers 50 times a day. Are we all nuts? > There's good technology out there. Let's use it. > > I help manage the canard forum at http://canardaviationforum.dmt.net > The majority of members are rotary enthusiasts. The forum is running on a > member's business server and he maintains it for free. There's lots of free > space. While the main forum is for pilots who fly the "Wright" way, it's > trivial to add a section dedicated to Fly-Rotary. I just did. It can be > found at http://canardaviationforum.dmt.net/forumdisplay.php?f=59 > > Now let me be plain - I read this mail list 4 times a day or more, and I > find the information and the camaraderie here very very valuable. I also > read the canard forum and the Cozy list. This means I have to sift through a > bunch of irrelevant text to be sure I don't miss anything important. A few > decades ago, around the time they came out with the 2nd gen 13B, someone > invented a concept called "Threads". They can be made sticky, moved, updated > and organized hierarchically for easy access. You can edit/correct your > posts (what a concept!) and set it up so you get an email when a thread > you're interested in gets a posting. The WIKI idea, while commendable, is a > poor representation of 1/10 of the features of a forum. Come on, guys - > let's do it right, and all in one place! > > The last thing I want to do is cause trouble, get excommunicated for heresy, > or split up this wonderful group, but I just can't see a valid reason to > keep struggling with old technology. We don't do it with our airplanes. Why > do it with our computers? The perfect solution, in my humble opinion, would > be for everyone reading this message to log into the above forum address, > create an ID, and start communicating effectively from here on. > > Anyone with me? > > John (running and ducking for cover) > > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >