Return-Path: <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Received: from web41527.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.94.134] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1)
  with SMTP id 724690 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:24:26 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.218.94.134; envelope-from=tomtugan@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 56478 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Feb 2005 05:23:41 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  b=ULJN7VZ2EZX/UJAxJunSSD+P4X6v6t9unpJ+5LYHSjukMvogfCO2szY3LAdKxXBUn9NQnib1pJnzrbSmgf7OnqrIdZ0b9IGxTaeN8sI04aBhKnOFvcsE9k2j7EbZb9YCszSYIAPNehfX/aJPU8xePCDppCAdopqw/+gwXW8wgpY=  ;
Message-ID: <20050211052341.56476.qmail@web41527.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.224.93.112] by web41527.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:23:41 PST
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:23:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tomtugan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary Displacement, Was: Solved!!!!
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-724698@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-245158847-1108099421=:55831"

--0-245158847-1108099421=:55831
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Yes you're right Bob, your statement that 'all the displacement gets used during one rev of the rotors is the same as what Ed was saying.   I didn't carefully follow Ed's very last fix that put that in.   
 
On your post I wasn't sure what the point being interjected was and what is supporting discussion.   Was the point: "Displacement doesn't have anything to do with RPM, it's just how much does the engine displace!" and do you think that disagrees with what Ed was saying?  Or were you even disagreeing at all?
 
Tom


Bob White <bob@bob-white.com> wrote:

Hi Tom,

As I say, my comment isn't directed at the calculations at all. There
has been much discussion about what the displacement is, and how much of
the rotation to count. Mazda claiming 1.3 L for example.

I stand by my statement about the displacement. That seems to be
exactly the way Ed has used it.


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
--0-245158847-1108099421=:55831
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV>Yes&nbsp;you're right Bob,&nbsp;your statement that 'all the displacement gets used during one rev of the rotors is the same as what Ed was saying.&nbsp;&nbsp; I didn't carefully follow&nbsp;Ed's very last fix that put that in.&nbsp;&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>On your post I wasn't sure what the point being interjected was and what is supporting discussion.&nbsp;&nbsp; Was the point: "Displacement doesn't have anything to do with RPM, it's just how much does the engine displace!" and do you think that disagrees with what Ed was saying?&nbsp; Or were you even disagreeing at all?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tom<BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR><B><I>Bob White &lt;bob@bob-white.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>Hi Tom,<BR><BR>As I say, my comment isn't directed at the calculations at all. There<BR>has been much discussion about what the displacement is, and how much of<BR>the rotation to count. Mazda claiming 1.3 L for example.<BR><BR>I stand by my statement about the displacement. That seems to be<BR>exactly the way Ed has used it.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p>
		<hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br> 
Yahoo! Search presents - <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=30648/*http://movies.yahoo.com/movies/feature/jibjabinaugural.html">Jib Jab's 'Second Term'</a>
--0-245158847-1108099421=:55831--