Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 724208 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:45:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.85; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005021021443001400rsatce>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:44:30 +0000 Message-ID: <06fa01c50fb9$a75b92d0$057ba8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] For Tom Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Microtech EFI andTuning, was Leon's nose Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:44:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_06F7_01C50F8F.BB16F0F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_06F7_01C50F8F.BB16F0F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leon: I couldn't agree with you more. I personally think you need an = old rx to run your aircraft engine around on the street also before = worrying about tuning for flight. Just personal opinion; but, I know = they not only seem to do better but it is a heck of a lot easier to cost = to the curb and walk home.=20 >>> ( the cold amber liquid!! ) <<< you mean foster's ain't ozian for beer ? has my tv lied to me = again/still ? >>> I'm sure that there are a bunch of people in the USA (being the home of = hot-rodding), who are far cleverer than I, and are equally adept at the = "black art" of tuning aftermarket EFI systems. The trick is to find one = in your neck of the woods. <<< actually the trick is to find one who will even admit it and be honest = about it, if there is such; then the rest gets easier. jofarr ----- Original Message ----- From: Leon=20 With new motors, my preferred way of running them in is to stick them = in a "Mule" and just drive around for 600 miles / 1,000 km or so. It's = not just the miles/time. It's the process of multiple heat and cool = cycles which allows everything to "snuggle in". Obviously this isn't = practical for most people. But I do get the best results with motors = that have been carefully bedded-in. They tend to last longer, and run = "sweeter". ------=_NextPart_000_06F7_01C50F8F.BB16F0F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Leon: I couldn't agree with you = more. I=20 personally think you need an old rx to run your aircraft engine around = on the=20 street also before worrying about tuning for flight. Just = personal=20 opinion; but, I know they not only seem to do better but it is a heck of = a lot=20 easier to cost to the curb and walk home.

>>>

( the cold amber liquid!! = )

<<<

you mean foster's ain't ozian for beer = ? has my tv=20 lied to me again/still ?

>>>

I'm sure that there are a bunch of = people in the=20 USA (being the home of hot-rodding), who are far cleverer than = I, and=20 are equally adept at the "black art" of tuning aftermarket EFI = systems. =20 The trick is to find one in your neck of the woods.

<<<

actually the trick is to find one who = will even=20 admit it and be honest about it, if there is such; then the rest = gets=20 easier.

jofarr

----- Original Message ----- = From: Leon

With new motors, my preferred = way of=20 running them in is to stick them in a "Mule" and just drive around for = 600=20 miles / 1,000 km or so. It's not just the miles/time. = It's=20 the process of multiple heat and cool cycles which allows everything = to=20 "snuggle in". Obviously this isn't practical for most = people. But=20 I do get the best results with motors that have been carefully=20 bedded-in. They tend to last longer, and run=20 "sweeter".

------=_NextPart_000_06F7_01C50F8F.BB16F0F0--