Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #15263
From: William <wschertz@ispwest.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: water cooled matrix in oil pan
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:14:16 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Although flow is conserved, a high velocity through oil cooler tubes works better with oil than a low velocity through the oil pan.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wynn, Mike" <mike.wynn@spectra-physics.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: water cooled matrix in oil pan



`The problem with this is that the oil is essentially stagnant in the pan'

Al, this is only 'cause you haven't looked inside when its running - there's
an oil pump driving this stuff round the engine all the time, it just starts
and finishes at the bottom of the oil pan.  The flow rate will be the same
as anywhere else on the system that you would choose to oil/air cooler. Its
true that the `dwell time' in the oil pan will be longer as this is your
reservoir but this is a good thing.

One can discuss the merits of a (hot) water to (hotter) oil heat exchanger,
but that's a different question and one where I have no experience.  They
are used on cars a lot but I don't know about their efficiency for
continuous high power operation.


Mike
Nice moose Kevin

 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster