Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 22:41:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <13brv3@mchsi.com> Received: from sccmmhc01.mchsi.com ([204.127.203.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b4) with ESMTP id 2152155 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 21:31:58 -0400 Received: from rad (12-218-74-116.client.mchsi.com[12.218.74.116]) by sccmmhc01.mchsi.com (sccmmhc01) with SMTP id <20030430013156mm100gc8mke>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:31:57 +0000 Reply-To: <13brv3@mchsi.com> From: <13brv3@mchsi.com> X-Original-To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: still no insurance X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:31:58 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <003601c30eb8$4ccbecb0$0201a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: When I insured my Vari Eze (0-200) with Avemco and now Falcon ( I switched because Avemco was screwing my Canard Aviator buddies) neither one of them asked what kind of engine I have. Perhaps what they don't know won't hurt them! ------------ =3D=3D=3D> I would consider that a last resort sort of option, because = it seems a little risky. It would buy some time if needed though. Now if I could get a ground only policy, they wouldn't have any reason = to care what kind of engine I had. This just doesn't seem like one of the standard options though. Rusty =20