Return-Path: Received: from mv-relay-1.splasers.com ([65.119.109.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 607642 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:25:30 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.119.109.133; envelope-from=mike.wynn@spectra-physics.com Received: from usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com (firewall [172.22.1.10]) by mv-relay-1.splasers.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0ENgen20103 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:42:40 -0800 Received: by usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:24:53 -0800 Message-ID: <5FA49D34561C5945BA9258B31BF648800355D918@usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com> From: "Wynn, Mike" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: water cooled matrix in oil pan Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:24:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" `The problem with this is that the oil is essentially stagnant in the pan' Al, this is only 'cause you haven't looked inside when its running - there's an oil pump driving this stuff round the engine all the time, it just starts and finishes at the bottom of the oil pan. The flow rate will be the same as anywhere else on the system that you would choose to oil/air cooler. Its true that the `dwell time' in the oil pan will be longer as this is your reservoir but this is a good thing. One can discuss the merits of a (hot) water to (hotter) oil heat exchanger, but that's a different question and one where I have no experience. They are used on cars a lot but I don't know about their efficiency for continuous high power operation. Mike Nice moose Kevin