Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.166.240.5; envelope-from=jackoford@theofficenet.com
Message-ID: <009901c4fa62$68ac0720$0200a8c0@jack>
From: "Jack Ford" <jackoford@theofficenet.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-607110@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Deprogramming Therapy was Re: [FlyRotary]Re: Welcome to the Club
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:56:39 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

A corrollary is: Assuming a conclusion, it is simple matter to develop
premises to support it. (The foundation of all governments and religions).

Jack Ford

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ernest Christley" <echristl@cisco.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 8:11 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Deprogramming Therapy was Re: [FlyRotary]Re:
Welcome to the Club


> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 10:44, Jerry Hey wrote:
>
> > Believe me when I say that until TODAY I thought the EWP was dead in
> > the water.  That makes me about 2 years behind. >
> The calculations from the ACRE list that I've seen are also predicated
> on 30gpm flow.  30gpm is a nice safe number, but is not an absolute
> necessity.  The number can easily drop IF you're willing to design for a
> higher temperature drop across the radiator.  In fact, for the same
> amount of radiator and heat removal, a lower flow rate WILL result in a
> higher temp drop up to the point where you get steam in and water out
> 8*)
>
> It's just like Leon said earlier, if you lock yourself down to the wrong
> assumption, the resulting logic and calculations arent' worth the
> electronics they're posted to the list with.
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>