Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 607038 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:44:32 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050114144402.BTAX2402.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:44:02 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] water cooled matrix in the oil pan Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:44:19 -0600 Message-ID: <000001c4fa47$87d4d1b0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4FA15.3D3A61B0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4FA15.3D3A61B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was reading through some of the old postings and came across Leon's = post in which he suggested putting a water cooled matrix in a modified oil = pan (sump). This seems to have a lot going for it. I knew I remembered reading that on the list, and Leon mentioned it = again following my recent incident. I particularly like (for obvious reasons) the fact that you can avoid having pressurized oil in a cooler near the = hot exhaust. I also like the thought of oil/water coolers, and this would = be a very convenient way to mount one. I haven't completely given up the = thought of trying this, but I just don't think I have room for the pan = modifications with my current mount. =20 What am I missing (apart from pictures of wombats and/or nude moose). Very good :-) =20 Rusty (now collecting oil coolers) =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4FA15.3D3A61B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

I was reading through some of the old postings and = came across=20 Leon's post in which he suggested putting a water cooled matrix in a = modified=20 oil pan (sump).  This seems to have a lot going for it.

I knew I = remembered=20 reading that on the list, and Leon mentioned it again following my = recent=20 incident.  I particularly like (for obvious reasons)  the fact = that=20 you can avoid having pressurized oil in a cooler near the hot = exhaust.  I=20 also like the thought of oil/water coolers, and this would be a very = convenient=20 way to mount one.  I haven't completely given up = the thought=20 of trying this, but I just don't think I have room for the pan=20 modifications with my current=20 mount.     

What am I missing = (apart from=20 pictures of wombats and/or nude moose).

Very = good=20 :-)
 
Rusty (now collecting oil=20 coolers)
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C4FA15.3D3A61B0--