Return-Path: Received: from imo-m20.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 606781 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:07:21 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.1; envelope-from=PhilWhite9@aol.com Received: from PhilWhite9@aol.com by imo-m20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.12a.54a9483c (15877) for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from athlon2400 (c-24-15-20-114.client.comcast.net [24.15.20.114]) by air-id07.mx.aol.com (v104.17) with ESMTP id MAILINID74-3e0541e75365201; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:06:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:03:23 -0600 From: "Phil White" Subject: Re: EWP To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <41E7529B.5040605@aol.com> References: X-Mailer: AOL Communicator (20030919.3 Win) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii X-AOL-IP: 24.15.20.114 Has anyone considered the cooling combination that occurs to me: install smaller than stock pulley on eccentric shaft to drive stock pump at lower speed, avoiding cavitation problems and reducing needed drive power, and then augmenting the flow with an Electric Water Pump for climb, taxiing, and extra-hot days? Seems like the mix would offer the best of both worlds, and maybe some control over water temps in cold conditions. Thoughts? Phil in IL, 20B for an RV-10 Jerry Hey wrote on 1/13/2005, 5:02 PM: > Thank you Leon. If you tell me the electric water pump works, then my > universe is truly shaken. I may need deprogramming. Jerry > > > > On Thursday, January 13, 2005, at 03:07 PM, Leon wrote: > > > Hi Jerry, > > > > You have just joined the illustrious "Persona Non Grata De Lamar" Club. > > Congratulations!!!! > > > > It is only a matter of time before those who THINK they know what they > > are > > talking about get really upset by those of us who DO. > > > > Among a multitude of topics, my particularly favourite "hot button" > > was the > > Electric Water Pump. Todd Bartrim proved HIM (His Imperious Majesty) > > wrong, > > and also demonstrated his deficiency in Math as well. He'd never > > admit it > > though!! > > > > I mean, what can you expect from a person who has NEVER (as far as I > > have > > been able to ascertain anway) EVER built even ONE rotary engine, let > > alone > > got > > it running, and let alone had to tune it or warrant it?? He might be > > a > > genious at aerodynamics, and may be a whiz with Rhino CAD, but HOW > > can such > > a person hold himself out to be an expert on rotary engines? > > > > The ACRE Newsletter is better known as LSTIRS, the "Lamar School of > > Theoretical Interplanetary Rocket Science". Leave it to the "rocket > > scientists"! Seems all the real experimentalists end up here! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Leon > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jerry Hey" > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 12:17 AM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] No more ACRE (for me) > > > > > >> I cancelled my subscription to ACRE yesterday after a running > >> argument > >> with Paul Lamar over "p port tuning" became intolerable. It was not > >> really about p port tuning but that was the pretext. Paul is pissed > >> off because I rejected his advice. That is the bottom line. > >> > >> Anyway, I don't want to belabor you guys with the lurid details. I'm > >> glad to be able to land here. Jerry > >> > >> > >> > >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >