Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:52:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.netdoor.com ([208.137.128.157] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b3) with ESMTP-TLS id 2130289 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:57:54 -0400 Received: from netdoor.com (port634.jxn.netdoor.com [208.148.209.34]) by smtp3.netdoor.com (8.12.9/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h3FLvqiP016463 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:57:52 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <3E9C805F.706@netdoor.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:57:51 -0500 From: Charlie & Tupper England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary-friendly insurance companies? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) 13brv3@mchsi.com wrote: > To satisfy the airport you can get ground insurance, meaning that >as soon as the wheels leave the ground you are uninsured and the insurance >starts again when you land, its real cheep. > Ken Welter >--------------- > >Though I'd prefer in-flight coverage, I specifically asked Avemco about >ground coverage, and they said it wasn't available. The only liability >policy they will offer is the one I mentioned, which does cover in-flight >liability. I'm not sure they even realized it was going to be a rotary >engine, or they might not have offered anything. I would certainly have >told them, but we just didn't get that far into the conversation. > >Cheers, >Rusty > Rusty, If you've insured a factory plane through a local agent, give them a call. You might find that an agent that knows you combined with the 'RV' in the plane's name can get you coverage at a reasonable price by calling the right underwriter & pleading your case. Charlie