Return-Path: Received: from a34-mta02.direcway.com ([66.82.4.91] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 528946 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:02:44 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.82.4.91; envelope-from=jackbeale@direcpc.com Received: from jack (dpc691916001.direcpc.com [69.19.16.1]) by a34-mta02.direcway.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with SMTP id <0I72001F4HJ8VS@a34-mta02.direcway.com> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:02:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:02:35 -0500 From: Jack Beale Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] suggestion To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <006f01c4c8b8$1c1b5ef0$2619050a@jack> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_1ADrIAUMRFIevcIYNFmzwA)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_1ADrIAUMRFIevcIYNFmzwA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT MessageJ, And, I second that request... and raise you one...! Would it be possible to use a larger point type than 10-pt...? 10-pt IS readable, but a PITA to scan quickly. Thanks all. Jack Beale jack.beale@att.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: John Slade To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:30 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] suggestion Thomas, I notice that you're bottom posting. I'll assume its habit. That's NOT the standard here. I think the preferences of members were confirmed in replies to your suggestion. MY suggestion and request is to go with the flow. John --Boundary_(ID_1ADrIAUMRFIevcIYNFmzwA) Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Message
J,
 
    And, I second that request... and raise you one...!
 
    Would it be possible to use a larger point type than 10-pt...?  10-pt IS readable, but a PITA to scan quickly.
 
    Thanks all.

Jack Beale
jack.beale@att.net
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: John Slade
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 7:30 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] suggestion

Thomas,
 
I notice that you're bottom posting. I'll assume its habit.
 
That's NOT the standard here. 
 
I think the preferences of members were confirmed in replies to your suggestion.
MY suggestion and request is to go with the flow.
John
 
--Boundary_(ID_1ADrIAUMRFIevcIYNFmzwA)--