Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.117] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 527961 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:41:15 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.117; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from 204.127.135.58 ([204.127.135.58]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <2004111118403511300d8cm3e>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:40:45 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.106] by 204.127.135.58; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:40:34 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Dave's TO4 Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:40:34 +0000 Message-Id: <111120041840.23848.4193B2220006736700005D282160281060019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 18 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_23848_1100198434_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_23848_1100198434_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Dave, Speaking of your TO4 can you give us the numbers on yours ? Is it a TO4 B or E , compressor trim , turbine housing A/R ratio , etc , or any other special features such as inconel turbine , watercooled or dry housing ? Inquiring minds want to know ! Thanks, -- Kelly Troyer Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 -------------- Original message from "DaveLeonard" : -------------- "Tracy (installing longer intake runners in shoebox manifold - Turbo flyers beware : ) " OK, now that's just not fair. We "turbo" guys still are not catching you as it is... I guess it's time to consider the C-drive as well. Rusty, how did your engine mount end up? Did you put in the shims, or is your mount askew in the wrong directing? Ed, same question. Now that you are turning in the 'right' direction, you had the option of a metal prop. Did any of you strongly consider that option? I'm still waiting on parts to install the TO4. I'm starting to think that a TO4 with the C-drive might make some serious power (spray bars here I come). I am thinking that a shorter prop may not produce as much p-factor and allow me to accept my left engine offset. Thoughts? Dave Leonard --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_23848_1100198434_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dave,

Speaking of your TO4 can you give us the numbers on yours ? Is

it a TO4 B or E , compressor trim , turbine housing A/R ratio , etc , or

any other special features such as inconel turbine , watercooled or

dry housing ? Inquiring minds want to know !

Thanks,

--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2

-------------- Original message from "DaveLeonard" <daveleonard@cox.net>: --------------

"Tracy (installing longer intake runners in shoebox manifold - Turbo flyers beware : ) "

OK, now that's just not fair. We "turbo" guys still are not catching you as it is... I guess it's time to consider the C-drive as well. Rusty, how did your engine mount end up? Did you put in the shims, or is your mount askew in the wrong directing? Ed, same question.

Now that you are turning in the 'right' direction, you had the option of a metal prop. Did any of you strongly consider that option?

I'm still waiting on parts to install the TO4. I'm starting to think that a TO4 with the C-drive might make some serious power (spray bars here I come). I am thinking that a shorter prop may not produce as much p-factor and allow me to accept my left engine offset.

Thoughts?

Dave Leonard

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_23848_1100198434_0--