Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 527683 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:42:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.28; envelope-from=daveleonard@cox.net Received: from davidandanne ([68.111.224.107]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20041111154209.XPWW10733.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@davidandanne> for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:42:09 -0500 From: "DaveLeonard" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Rusty's Engine Mount (and Ed's too) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:42:08 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0038_01C4C7C1.F25D41B0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C4C7C1.F25D41B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message"Tracy (installing longer intake runners in shoebox manifold - Turbo flyers beware : ) " OK, now that's just not fair. We "turbo" guys still are not catching you as it is... I guess it's time to consider the C-drive as well. Rusty, how did your engine mount end up? Did you put in the shims, or is your mount askew in the wrong directing? Ed, same question. Now that you are turning in the 'right' direction, you had the option of a metal prop. Did any of you strongly consider that option? I'm still waiting on parts to install the TO4. I'm starting to think that a TO4 with the C-drive might make some serious power (spray bars here I come). I am thinking that a shorter prop may not produce as much p-factor and allow me to accept my left engine offset. Thoughts? Dave Leonard ------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C4C7C1.F25D41B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
"Tracy (installing longer = intake=20 runners in shoebox manifold - Turbo flyers beware : )  "
 
OK, now that's just not = fair.  We=20 "turbo" guys still are not catching you as it is...  I guess it's = time to=20 consider the C-drive as well.  Rusty, how did your engine mount end = up?  Did you put in the shims, or is your mount askew in the wrong=20 directing?  Ed, same question.
 
Now that you are turning in the = 'right'=20 direction, you had the option of a metal prop.  Did any of you = strongly=20 consider that option?
 
I'm still waiting on parts to = install the=20 TO4.  I'm starting to think that a TO4 with the C-drive might make = some=20 serious power (spray bars here I come).  I am thinking that a = shorter prop=20 may not produce as much p-factor and allow me to accept my left engine=20 offset. 
 
Thoughts?
 
Dave = Leonard
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C4C7C1.F25D41B0--