Return-Path: Received: from frontend2.cwpanama.net ([201.225.225.168] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 523779 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:56:30 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.168; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend2.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with SMTP id 30303804 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:55:59 -0500 Message-ID: <000c01c4c60f$c078d550$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Suggestion! Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:54:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C4C5E5.D7485140" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2741.2600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C4C5E5.D7485140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Staten=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Suggestion! So what you mean is to "bottom post" instead of "top posting" as I = have done? =20 Dave rijakits wrote: No complaint about the list, just a suggestion: Although this is not a moderated list ( ....congratulations to all = members for keeping a profesional tone and courtesy here, you won't believe = through how much cursing, badmouthing and plain verbal mud one has to go on = other sites to get to the essential..........), I suggest to have a short look = at ACRE. The suggestion is to answer all threads at the END of the mail and not = at the beginning like most e-mail programs will set you up to do. If it is a long thread, like the present EWP one, it gets quite old to scroll forth and back and stay sync with the order of answers given!:( If we all would agree to answer the e-mails at the bottom, one could = just scroll to the last post and read on, for any new guy on this particular thread it would be easier to read too, as it would be one continous read from start to end in chronological order - no need to scroll back and = forth between different answers! My 2 cents, Thomas J. RIGHT, and while you are at it, snip away all of the no need e-mail garbage! THomas J. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C4C5E5.D7485140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 David=20 Staten
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 = 8:06=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re:=20 Suggestion!

So what you mean is to "bottom post" instead of "top = posting"=20 as I have done?  <grin>
 
Dave

rijakits=20 wrote:
No complaint about the list, just a suggestion:

Although this is not a moderated list ( ....congratulations to all =
members
for keeping a profesional tone and courtesy here, you won't believe =
through
how much cursing, badmouthing and plain verbal mud one has to go on =
other
sites to get to the essential..........), I suggest to have a short look =
at
ACRE.

The suggestion is to answer all threads at the END of the mail and not =
at
the beginning like most e-mail programs will set you up to do.
If it is a long thread, like the present EWP one, it gets quite old to
scroll forth and back and stay sync with the order of answers given!:(

If we all would agree to answer the e-mails at the bottom, one could =
just
scroll to the last post and read on, for any new guy on this particular
thread it would be easier to read too, as it would be one continous read
from start to end in chronological order - no need to scroll back and =
forth
between different answers!
My 2 cents,

Thomas J.


RIGHT,
and while you are at it, snip away all of the =
no need e-mail garbage!
THomas =
J.
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C4C5E5.D7485140--