Return-Path: Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 522000 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 21:12:25 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.66; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from Carol ([209.214.45.41]) by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with SMTP id <20041108021155.YFYA2398.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@Carol> for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:11:55 -0500 Message-ID: <005101c4c538$4d1308b0$292dd6d1@Carol> From: "paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PM alternator/generator with EWP Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 20:11:45 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 6:15 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: PM alternator/generator with EWP > rijakits wrote: >> Again, my question: >>>From where do you have the idea, that belts are the major prolblem? >> >> Thomas J. >> >> > > > Not a major problem...but a potential softspot in any installation. They > are very susceptible to heat and abrasion. Things that can be engineered > out with a mass production car line, but are somewhat iffy in a one-off > plane installation. > > Added to that is the weight of two pulleys, a belt or two, and mounting > hardware, and you possibly have something that is quite a bit heavier than > necessary...especially considering that the mount and housing are built > studier than would be necessary without the sideload and vibration caused > by a belt. > > I believe that a direct-drive, PM generator could be fitted to a 13B. It > could possibly be lighter, occupy less room and be more reliable. If the > EWP is used, the total installation would be simpler, as one of the > reasons for a belt have been eliminated already. > Hi, Ernest....it would be wonderful for us canard builders to be able to get rid of the belts, as they are located very close to our aileron push-pull tubes. The loss of a belt could also mean the loss of aileron control. Converting to an EWP is of course, easy. If I can find a way to eliminate the belt to an alternator, I will be a happy camper indeed !!!! Please continue sharing any information you may find. Thanks for sharing your ideas. Paul Conner, 13b powered SQ2000 canard > -- > http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ > "This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against > instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make > mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their > decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >