Return-Path: Received: from ns5.rokland.us ([67.15.10.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP-TLS id 520951 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 19:13:03 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.15.10.31; envelope-from=bob@bob-white.com Received: from bgp01386220bgs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net ([68.35.160.74] helo=localhost) by ns5.rokland.us with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CQafX-000195-PF for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:12:32 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:12:29 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: EWP Message-Id: <20041106171229.18989869.bob@bob-white.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0beta1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns5.rokland.us X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bob-white.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: I knew I had seen the current specs somewhere. This was on Summit Racing's web page for the Meziere WP-337 Vendor Meziere Enterprises, Inc. Product Line Meziere Import Electric Water Pumps Universal Yes Pump Material Aluminum Pump Finish Black anodized Flow Rate @ 12 Volts (gpm) 55 GPM Flow Rate @ 16 Volts (gpm) (Not Specified) Hose Adapter Required Yes Hose Adapter Included No Hose Adapter Thread Size 1 in. NPT Inlet Hose Size (Not Specified) Inlet Hose Attachment (Not Specified) Overall Depth (in) (Not Specified) Amperage Drawn 9-11 Weight (lbs) 6.2 Quantity Sold individually. So, the mfg is claiming 11 amps for the 55 gpm pump. Bob White On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:54:19 -0800 "Al Gietzen" wrote: > Based on Todd's correction of the earlier unbelievable numbers on > current drawer, you can expect somewhere in the neighborhood of 35-40 > amps continuous for 25 gpm of flow (which is believable) - if the pump > will produce that much flow in a real cooling system. That's based on > the pump power going roughly as the square of the flow rate. > > > > Al > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > On Behalf Of Todd Bartrim > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 1:28 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP > > > > Whoaa, before anybody gets worked up over my current draw figures, I'd > made a mistake in my report and had sent another post correcting it > the next day. Below is the corrected post.... hmmnn, is there a way of > going back into the archives to correct erroneous data, as this same > issue came up once before based on my incorrect data post. > > > > Hi Guy's > I had a hard time believing the current draw for the pump so I > brought home my good "Fluke" multimeter from work. The one I used last > night was a cheap Digital meter from "Canadian Tire". I seldom use > this one, so I'm not familiar with it but since it is very similar in > outward appearance to my "Fluke 87" I assumed the same functions would > apply. They don't. > > OK,OK, enough excuses, now for the real current draw. > > * continuous current draw - 4.3 amps > > * max inrush current draw at 100mS - 6.8 amps > > * max inrush current draw at 250uS - 13 amps > > * continuous current draw at minimum controlled flow - .2 amps > > The max inrush current is not really relevant to our concerns, but > there it is for those that care. > > This higher current flow is still well within acceptable limits for my > needs, and I expect that while in cruise flight, the controller will > be reducing pump speed and current draw. > > I've reposted the flow measurements along with this post with the > incorrect current draw deleted. I hope this clears up any confusion > about EWP current requirements. I > > > I ran the first test with the Ford evap cores in the system, > plumbed > in parallel. > > * Max flow 9.3 usg/m 35 l/m > > * 12.07 volt battery supply voltage > > * > > Second test had no evap cores in the system. Simply recirced water > through pump - engine - header tank - pump. > > * max flow 13.0 usg/m 49 l/m > > * 12.06 volt battery supply voltage > > * > > Third test, I plumbed in a set of GM (Harrison) evap cores in > parallel, > into the system. I hung them just below my mounted Ford cores, using > they same pipe sizes in an effort to have comparable test conditions. > > * max flow 7.7 usg/m 29 l/m > > * 12.4 volts supply voltage (I hooked a trickle charger to the > battery) > > * > > In each test configuration test results are with heater valve > closed. > Heater core added .5 usg/m in each case. > > > > In all of the above tests the electronic pump controller was > bypassed to > give full battery voltage to the pump. With the pump controller in > use, as the water was cold well water, controller had pump at minimum > flow which was measured at .6 usg/m - 2.2 l/m. > > > > I've just been lurking since returning from school as I've got allot > to catch up on around here, so am trying not to get distracted with > the list, however I needed to jump in on this one. I need to head out > to the airport today to install my new radio and hopefully get out for > a flight, as they are calling for 5" of snow tonight. > > > > Todd Bartrim > > > > RV9Endurance > > 13B Turbo Rotary > > C-FSTB > > http://www3.telus.net/haywire/RV-9/C-FSTB.htm > > > > "The world will always have a place for those that bring > hard > work and determination to the things they do." > > > > -- http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (soon)