Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 520067 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 22:02:27 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20041106030157.HNQA2400.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:01:57 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Error in presentation calculations Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:02:02 -0600 Message-ID: <000b01c4c3ac$fd316300$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4C37A.B296F300" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4C37A.B296F300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It will be interesting to see how it cools with just the EWP. =20 =20 It's going to be hard to tell much, other than how it "seems" to work compared to the mechanical pump. The real test would be to fly it with = only the EWP, but I'm unwilling to intentionally make a flight with only = battery power. If I could easily run the alternator, without running the = mechanical pump, I'd certainly try it, because I'm convinced that the EWP will work just fine. No doubt in my mind. If I happen to see any rpm increase = when I do my test, you can bet that the 2nd EWP will find it's way in place of = the mechanical pump in short order. =20 =20 BTW, thanks for the kind words. I'm not really sure how much I've contributed, but if I talked you out of the turbo, then my work is = complete :-) =20 Rusty =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4C37A.B296F300 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
It will be interesting to see how = it cools=20 with just the EWP.   
 
It's going to be hard to tell much, other than = how it=20 "seems" to work compared to the mechanical pump.  The real test = would be to=20 fly it with only the EWP, but I'm unwilling to intentionally make a = flight=20 with only battery power.  If I could easily run the = alternator,=20 without running the mechanical pump, I'd certainly try it, because I'm = convinced=20 that the EWP will work just fine.  No doubt in my = mind.  If=20 I happen to see any rpm increase when I do my test, you can bet that the = 2nd EWP=20 will find it's way in place of the mechanical pump in short=20 order.  
 
BTW, thanks for the kind words.  I'm = not really=20 sure how much I've contributed, but if I talked you out of the = turbo, then=20 my work is complete :-)
 
Rusty
 
------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C4C37A.B296F300--