Return-Path: Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 520057 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:36:30 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.68; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from Carol ([209.214.45.4]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with SMTP id <20041106023558.PGB2350.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@Carol> for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:35:58 -0500 Message-ID: <007601c4c3a9$55844e40$042dd6d1@Carol> From: "paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Error in presentation calculations Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 20:35:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01C4C377.0A23F630" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C4C377.0A23F630 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 6:49 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Error in presentation calculations I think Rusty is running an EWP in addition to the mechanical pump. = Any others? Any advice? I need to finalize my design. Thanks, Bob White Thanks for reminding me to test my EWP without the mechanical pump. = I'm installing the cowl cheek extensions, and reworking the oil cooler = scoop and TB air inlet over the next week or so. When I do my full = throttle ground test of the new TB inlet, I'll also do a test where I = pull the alt/wp belt to make sure it seems to cool, and see if I get any = more rpm (fat chance) with only the EWP. =20 Cheers, Rusty =20 It will be interesting to see how it cools with just the EWP. I'm = sure I am not the only one curious. Please keep us posted. Thanks for = all the valuable information you have already shared with us. You have = saved me a lot of time and money because I followed your lead and didn't = have to do things twice. Keep up the good work and flow of information. = Paul Conner ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C4C377.0A23F630 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 = 6:49=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: = Error in=20 presentation calculations

I think Rusty is running an EWP in addition to the = mechanical=20 pump.  Any others?  Any advice?

I need to finalize my = design.

Thanks,
Bob White

Thanks = for reminding=20 me to test my EWP without the mechanical pump.  I'm installing = the cowl=20 cheek extensions, and reworking the oil cooler scoop and TB=20 air inlet over the next week or so.  When I do my full = throttle=20 ground test of the new TB inlet, I'll also do a test where I pull = the=20 alt/wp belt to make sure it seems to cool, and see if I get any more = rpm (fat=20 chance) with only the EWP.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty
    

It will be interesting to see how it cools with = just the=20 EWP.  I'm sure I am not the only one curious.  Please keep = us=20 posted.  Thanks for all the valuable information you have already = shared=20 with us. You have saved me a lot of time and money because I followed = your=20 lead and didn't have to do things twice.  Keep up the good work = and flow=20 of information.  Paul=20 Conner


------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C4C377.0A23F630--