Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #1252
From: sqpilot@earthlink <sqpilot@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:28:51 -0500
To: <flyrotary>
Message
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank

I am planning on having the fuel lines go from both tanks to the fuel selector valve, then to the fuel sump, then to the pump, then to the fuel rail, injectors, and finally to the fuel pressure regulator. After that, is it best to have the unused fuel go back into the approximately 2 gallon fuel sump, or directly back to one of the fuel strake tanks?  
 
If you're going to have a 2 gallon fuel sump anyway, I'd return the fuel to it.   Do you actually need the sump for some other reason?  If not, you could eliminate it, and run the fuel back to one or both tanks.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 
Hi, Rusty and thanks for the response. I have been wondering if I really even need a sump tank. I know that Velocity Aircraft uses one in their aircraft, so I just figured they know a lot more about these canards than I do. It would, however be nice to totally eliminate a sump tank and just run the return back to say, the left fuel strake.  My fuel pick-up is very close to the bottom of the tank, to the rear, so it would work fine in climb attitudes when low on fuel. Only when the nose is pointed down might I have a problem picking up fuel in a low fuel condition.  However, in my 31 years of military and civilian flying, I pride myself in never allowing myself to get in a low fuel situation. I am a firm believer that air in the tanks make no contribution to maintaining straight and level flight.  Thanks again.  Paul Conner
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster