Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: flyrotary
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 09:25:11 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2083579@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca>
Received: from [206.47.199.164] (HELO simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b1)
  with ESMTP id 2083390 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:08:58 -0500
Received: from nbnet.nb.ca ([207.179.161.196])
          by simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP
          id <20030323030855.JRTV8775.simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@nbnet.nb.ca>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:08:55 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <3E7D2594.B447F3A@nbnet.nb.ca>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:10:12 -0400
From: Rino <lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Thick or Thin? The debate continues
References: <list-2081956@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Here's a question for the number crunchers.  Which will be more efficient:
> 
> A)A thick radiator with a high cooling air flow rate?
> or
> B)A thin radiator with a low cooling air flow rate?
> 
> Personally, it's starting to make my head hurt.
> 

I do not understand this question.
Why does one has to exclude the other?

Rino