Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:08:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ncsmtp02.ogw.rr.com ([24.93.67.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1793772 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:08:23 -0400 Received: from mail5.carolina.rr.com (fe5 [24.93.67.52]) by ncsmtp02.ogw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8TJ8gup018789 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:08:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from o7y6b5 ([24.25.90.153]) by mail5.carolina.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:08:23 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <000801c267ec$52bdabe0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] water pumps X-Original-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:13:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 John, A gain of 40 hp is contingent on many factors and it may be possible on a 500+ HP engine or especially on those drag racing machines which on nitro may put out over 2000 HP. In their case, where the run is over in a matter of a few seconds, it may make sense to use an electric water pump. But regardless of using electric or mechanical pump it takes the same amount of power to flow the same volume of coolant at X GPM. Additionally, anytime you convert energy from one form to another you lose some power since no conversion is 100% efficient. So converting from mechanical to electrical (via the alternator) and then back to mechanical (using an electric water pump) is more of a loss than if you drove it with a mechanical pump to start with. Again for short duration coolant situations, storing the energy in battery and disengaging the mechanical pump will undoubtedly save some HP that would have been used in driving the pump. The electrical pump can circulate the coolant after the run to keep the engine from melting down, but would be hopeless trying to provide the coolant flow necessary to keep the block from melting - you would need a 2-4 HP electrical motor and if you have ever seen one you know they are Huge! Almost as large as a Chevy v8 engine. I can assure you that if auto engine manufactors could gain 40 HP or even 20 by converting from mechanical to electrical pump it would be done. This topic comes up from time to time and gets addressed with more or less vigor - but, in no case has it withstood the rigors of careful and analytical scrutiny So for short duration high power applications, an electric water pump can circulate coolant well enough to cool the engine - after the run is completed. However, I doubt if it would be up to the task of removing heat adequate if the engine maintained an output anywhere near WOT. So for long duration, high output situation (such as aircraft) the mechanical coolant pump can't be beat. My 0.02 worth. Ed Anderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "john" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 2:47 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] water pumps > There is an article in hot rod mag this month that says an electric water > pump has made gains of 40 hp, it states that it takes less power to run an > alternator than a pump and units can be fabricated from universal units from > hot rod supply houses. JohnD >