Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:05:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1791670 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:23:05 -0400 Received: from unknown ([12.86.88.206]) by mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with SMTP id <20020926172246.HUOU29048.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@unknown> for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:22:46 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <002101c26581$e0638400$ce58560c@unknown> From: "Michael D. Callahan" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Synthetic oil? X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:26:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Tracy is dead on here. I have a friend who worked at the local Mazda dealership, and was the head mechanic between the mid 70's and mid 90s. That was his reasoning for not using it, as well. In a modified engine without cats, it should be no problem. I run synthetic in the RE-5 and all my other vehicles, except the 74 step van which I refer to as the SUV (Seriously Ugly Van). Mike C.